Key result
Home point-of-care PT-INR testing in children on long-term warfarin achieved a median time in therapeutic range of 75.0 compared to 70.0 with hospital monitoring, with no major complications.
Why the study?
Does home point-of-care PT-INR testing maintain warfarin control compared to hospital monitoring in children on long-term warfarin?
Cohort (n=37)
Does home point-of-care PT-INR testing maintain warfarin control compared to hospital monitoring in children on long-term warfarin?
Home point-of-care INR testing in children on long-term warfarin is safe and maintains therapeutic control comparably to hospital monitoring.
Supports home point-of-care INR testing feasibility in children on warfarin; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Capillary whole-blood point-of-care prothrombin-INR (PT-INR) testing at home is an alternative to hospital-based monitoring for patients on lifelong warfarin. AIM: To retrospectively assess the safety and efficacy of home point-of-care testing for children on long-term warfarin. METHOD: All patients who had been on point-of-care home monitoring for at least 6 months were included in the study. Their warfarin control was assessed while on home monitoring and compared to that achieved in a similar period before changing from hospital monitoring. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were studied for a mean of 1.0 year on clinic monitoring and 1.07 years on home monitoring. The clinic monitoring tests were within a therapeutic range for a median 70.0 (inter-quartile range 34.5) and the home monitoring were within range for median 75.0 (inter-quartile range 44.5). There were no major haemorrhagic or thrombotic complications in either group during the study period. Only 2.3% of all tests had an INR greater than 6.0 with no statistical differences seen between the clinic and home monitoring groups. CONCLUSION: Home point-of-care testing in children on lifelong warfarin is safe, effective and offers a number of advantages to the child and family. Ongoing training and support for the families is essential for this service.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bradbury et al. (2007) conducted a cohort in Long-term warfarin therapy (n=37). Home point-of-care PT-INR testing vs. Hospital-based clinic monitoring was evaluated on Tests within therapeutic range (median). Home point-of-care PT-INR testing in children on long-term warfarin achieved a median time in therapeutic range of 75.0 compared to 70.0 with hospital monitoring, with no major complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: