PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 4, 2007Archives of Disease in Childhood39 citations

A comparative study of anticoagulant control in patients on long-term warfarin using home and hospital monitoring of the international normalised ratio

View Full Paper
MBM J E BradburyBirmingham Children's HospitalGTGraham W. TaylorAmyloidosis FoundationPSPM ShortNinewells Hospital

Key Result

Home point-of-care PT-INR testing in children on long-term warfarin achieved a median time in therapeutic range of 75.0 compared to 70.0 with hospital monitoring, with no major complications.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=37)

Structured PICO

Does home point-of-care PT-INR testing maintain warfarin control compared to hospital monitoring in children on long-term warfarin?

P
Population
37 children on long-term warfarin who had been on point-of-care home monitoring for at least 6 months, evaluated retrospectively.
E
Exposure
Capillary whole-blood point-of-care prothrombin-INR (PT-INR) testing at home
C
Comparator
Hospital-based/clinic monitoring (assessed in a similar period before changing from hospital monitoring)
O
Outcome
Warfarin control (percentage of tests within therapeutic range)surrogate

Home point-of-care INR testing in children on long-term warfarin is safe and maintains therapeutic control comparably to hospital monitoring.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 75% vs 70%

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Capillary whole-blood point-of-care prothrombin-INR (PT-INR) testing at home is an alternative to hospital-based monitoring for patients on lifelong warfarin. AIM: To retrospectively assess the safety and efficacy of home point-of-care testing for children on long-term warfarin. METHOD: All patients who had been on point-of-care home monitoring for at least 6 months were included in the study. Their warfarin control was assessed while on home monitoring and compared to that achieved in a similar period before changing from hospital monitoring. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were studied for a mean of 1.0 year on clinic monitoring and 1.07 years on home monitoring. The clinic monitoring tests were within a therapeutic range for a median 70.0 (inter-quartile range 34.5) and the home monitoring were within range for median 75.0 (inter-quartile range 44.5). There were no major haemorrhagic or thrombotic complications in either group during the study period. Only 2.3% of all tests had an INR greater than 6.0 with no statistical differences seen between the clinic and home monitoring groups. CONCLUSION: Home point-of-care testing in children on lifelong warfarin is safe, effective and offers a number of advantages to the child and family. Ongoing training and support for the families is essential for this service.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bradbury et al. (2007) conducted a cohort in Long-term warfarin therapy (n=37). Home point-of-care PT-INR testing vs. Hospital-based clinic monitoring was evaluated on Tests within therapeutic range (median). Home point-of-care PT-INR testing in children on long-term warfarin achieved a median time in therapeutic range of 75.0 compared to 70.0 with hospital monitoring, with no major complications.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20a2df6236d09b9bcd394chttps://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2006.113886
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Oral Anticoagulant Drugs1991 · 569 citations
  2. 2Patient self‐testing is a reliable and acceptable alternative to laboratory INR monitoring2004 · 119 citations
  3. 3Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Pediatric Patients: a Prospective Study1994 · 154 citations
  4. 4Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation1994 · 224 citations
  5. 5Recommendations for patients undertaking self management of oral anticoagulation2001 · 87 citations