Different methods of data analysis for the BHS-protocol can cause the achieved grade for automated blood pressure devices to range from C to almost A for diastolic and D to B for systolic pressure.
OBJECTIVE: To show that different methods of data analysis affect the grading that blood pressure measuring devices achieve according to the British Hypertension Society (BHS)-protocol. METHODS: Based on the somewhat unclear description of the exact method of data analysis in the BHS-protocol four different methods can be discerned. The effect on the grading-results is calculated for these four different options. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: It is shown that using these four different options the achieved grade can range for diastolic blood pressure from C (option 1) to almost A (option 4) and for systolic blood pressure from D (option 1) to B (option 4). Different researchers may well have used different methods. Option 1 is the method that should be used. Also it is stated that the systematic error and the standard deviation of differences (SDD) are measures that give more insight to describe a device's performance. Calculating the grades after correction for the systematic error shows its influence and that of the SDD on the reported accuracy of a blood pressure measuring device.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Journal of Hypertension
Radboud University Nijmegen
Radboud University Medical Center
Add This Paper to Your Research Feed
Any time a new paper drops it will be there.
Braam et al. (Mon,) conducted a other in Blood pressure measurement. Different methods of data analysis was evaluated on Grading achieved according to the British Hypertension Society (BHS)-protocol. Different methods of data analysis for the BHS-protocol can cause the achieved grade for automated blood pressure devices to range from C to almost A for diastolic and D to B for systolic pressure.