Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
본 연구는 간호대학생을 대상으로 셀프리더십, 비판적 사고성향, 임상실습만족도 및 임상수행능력의 관계를 확인하고 임상실습만족도와 임상수행능력에 영향을 미치는 요인을 알아보고자 시행되었다. 두 개의 광역시에 소재하는 2개의 4년제 간호학과 3, 4학년에 재학 중인 199명을 대상으로 설문지로 측정하였다. 연구결과 간호대학생이 인지하는 셀프리더십, 비판적 사고 성향, 임상실습만족도 및 임상수행능력은 중간 이상으로 나타났으며, 이들 간에는 모두 유의한 순 상관관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 임상실습만족도에 영향을 주는 예측요인은 실습학기 (=. 223, t=3. 534, p=. 001), 전공만족 (=. 257, t=3. 962, p =. 217, t=3. 118, p=. 002), 셀프리더십 (=. 169, t=2. 260, p=. 025) 이었으며 30. 4%의 설명력을 나타냈다 (F=19. 145, p =-. 133, t=-1. 937, p=. 054), 비판적 사고성향 (=. 316, t=2. 551, p=. 012), 셀프리더십 (=. 323, t=4. 181, p <. 001) 이었으며 23. 7%의 설명력을 나타냈다 (F=10. 948, p <. 001). 따라서 간호대학생의 임상실습만족도와 임상수행능력을 높이기 위해서는 간호대학생의 비판적 사고와 셀프리더십을 높일 수 있는 교육과정 프로그램의 개발 및 적용이 필요하다. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship among self-leadership, critical thinking disposition, satisfaction of clinical practice and clinical practice competency of nursing students. Participants were 199 baccalaureate nursing students (3rd and 4th grades) in 2 cities. The data was collected by questionnaires and were analyzed with the SPSS/Win 21. 0 program, using descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation coefficient and multiple regression. Significant positive correlations were among self-leadership, critical thinking disposition, satisfaction of clinical practice and clinical practice competency. The regression model explained 30. 4% of satisfaction of clinical practice. The significant predictors of satisfaction of clinical practice were clinical experience, satisfaction of major, self-leadership and critical thinking disposition. The regression model explained 23. 7% of clinical practice competency. Health status, self-leadership and critical thinking disposition were factors influencing clinical practice competency. It should strengthen self-leadership and encourage critical thinking disposition to improve nursing students' satisfaction of clinical practice and clinical practice competency.
Park et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: