Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
There is high-certainty evidence that ECs with nicotine increase quit rates compared to NRT and moderate-certainty evidence that they increase quit rates compared to ECs without nicotine. Evidence comparing nicotine EC with usual care/no treatment also suggests benefit, but is less certain due to risk of bias inherent in the study design. Confidence intervals were for the most part wide for data on AEs, SAEs and other safety markers, with no difference in AEs between nicotine and non-nicotine ECs nor between nicotine ECs and NRT. Overall incidence of SAEs was low across all study arms. We did not detect evidence of serious harm from nicotine EC, but the longest follow-up was two years and the number of studies was small. The main limitation of the evidence base remains imprecision due to the small number of RCTs, often with low event rates. Further RCTs are underway. To ensure the review continues to provide up-to-date information to decision-makers, this review is a living systematic review. We run searches monthly, with the review updated when relevant new evidence becomes available. Please refer to the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for the review's current status.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nicola Lindson
Ailsa R. Butler
Hayden McRobbie
Cochrane library
Harvard University
University of Oxford
Massachusetts General Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lindson et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69592a1cbaf9b6bfdcb525e6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd010216.pub8
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: