Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) often occurs in the setting of structural heart disease and can affect patients with ischaemic or nonischaemic cardiomyopathies. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) provide mortality benefit and are therefore indicated for secondary prevention in patients with sustained VT, but they do not reduce arrhythmia burden. ICD shocks are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and antiarrhythmic medications are often used to prevent recurrent episodes. Catheter ablation is an effective treatment option for patients with VT in the setting of structural heart disease and, when successful, can reduce the number of ICD shocks. However, whether VT ablation results in a mortality benefit remains unclear. We aim to review the long-term outcomes in patients with different types of structural heart disease treated with VT ablation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jackson J. Liang
Electrophysiology
Pasquale Santangeli
Electrophysiology
David J. Callans
Electrophysiology
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0879d49a6c4ba6e610a76f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2015.4.3.177
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: