Young females are significantly underrepresented in blood flow restriction research, presumably due to the female menstrual cycle, highlighting the need to include both sexes in future studies.
Why are young females underrepresented in blood flow restriction research?
This review highlights the underrepresentation of young females in blood flow restriction research and advocates for their inclusion to determine potential sex differences.
Low-load resistance exercise with the blood flow restriction (BFR) has been shown to increase muscle size similar to that of traditional high-load resistance training. Throughout the BFR literature, there is a vast difference between the quantity of young females included in the literature compared to young males, older males and older females. Therefore, the purpose of this minireview is to discuss the underrepresentation of young females in the BFR literature and review the potential physiologic reasons as to why they may have been excluded. In conclusion, the female menstrual cycle, a normal physiological occurrence, is presumably the reason as to why majority of young females are excluded from participation in BFR studies. Instead of excluding females, we recommend that BFR studies should include both sexes and plot the results separately to determine whether a sex difference exists.
Counts et al. (Tue,) conducted a review in Blood flow restriction (BFR) research. Blood flow restriction (BFR) research was evaluated. Young females are significantly underrepresented in blood flow restriction research, presumably due to the female menstrual cycle, highlighting the need to include both sexes in future studies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: