The location-centric method for detecting phase singularity in cardiac fibrillation was highly robust and 28.6-fold faster than the conventional Iyer-Gray method in a 2D mathematical model.
Does the location-centric method improve computational efficiency and robustness for detecting phase singularity in a 2D mathematical model of AF compared to the Iyer-Gray method?
A novel location-centric algorithm significantly reduces computation time for detecting phase singularities in atrial fibrillation models while maintaining accuracy, which may facilitate real-time rotor mapping in clinical electrophysiology.
Effect estimate: 28.6-fold shorter run time
BACKGROUND: The point of phase singularity (PS) is considered to represent a spiral wave core or a rotor in cardiac fibrillation. Computational efficiency is important for detection of PS in clinical electrophysiology. We developed a novel algorithm for highly efficient and robust detection of PS. METHODS: In contrast to the conventional method, which calculates PS based on the line integral of the phase around a PS point equal to ±2π (the Iyer-Gray method), the proposed algorithm (the location-centric method) looks for the phase discontinuity point at which PS actually occurs. We tested the efficiency and robustness of these two methods in a two-dimensional mathematical model of atrial fibrillation (AF), with and without remodeling of ionic currents. RESULTS: 1. There was a significant association, in terms of the Hausdorff distance (3.30 ± 0.0 mm), between the PS points measured using the Iyer-Gray and location-centric methods, with almost identical PS trajectories generated by the two methods. 2. For the condition of electrical remodeling of AF (0.3 × ICaL), the PS points calculated by the two methods were satisfactorily co-localized (with the Hausdorff distance of 1.64 ± 0.09 mm). 3. The proposed location-centric method was substantially more efficient than the Iyer-Gray method, with a 28.6-fold and 28.2-fold shorter run times for the control and remodeling scenarios, respectively. CONCLUSION: We propose a new location-centric method for calculating PS, which is robust and more efficient compared with the conventionally used method.
Lee et al. (Thu,) conducted a other in Cardiac fibrillation. Location-centric method vs. Iyer-Gray method was evaluated on Computational run time and spatial agreement (Hausdorff distance) (28.6-fold shorter run time). The location-centric method for detecting phase singularity in cardiac fibrillation was highly robust and 28.6-fold faster than the conventional Iyer-Gray method in a 2D mathematical model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: