Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: What lesions to select for a most efficient dermatoscopic monitoring of patients with multiple nevi remains an unresolved issue. OBJECTIVE: To compare the grade of atypia of melanomas and nevi of the same patient at baseline. METHODS: Prospective observational study using 236 dermatoscopic baseline images (59 quartets from 59 patients, each including one melanoma detected during follow-up and three nevi). Dermatologists (n = 26) were asked to assess the 'grade of dermatoscopic atypia' on a numerical scale and to identify the melanomas. RESULTS: On average, each dermatologist identified 24 of 59 melanomas (40%, range: 11-37). The number of correct picks was greater for dermatologists with moderate (mean: 28) or high (mean: 28) experience compared to beginners (mean 17; P < 0.001). In three of the 59 sets, none of the 26 dermatologists identified the melanoma. The mean grade of dermatoscopic atypia was 2.5 for nevi (95% CI: 2.4-2.6) and 3.0 for melanomas (95% CI: 2.9-3.1, P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Rating dermatologists were informed that each quartet of images included one melanoma creating substantial deviation from a real-life situation. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of melanomas detected during follow-up cannot be differentiated from nevi at baseline. This necessitates the additional inclusion of less atypical lesions for monitoring.
Tschandl et al. (Tue,) studied this question.