Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This introduction offers an initial account of the usefulness of an interdisciplinary encounter between the fields of linguistic anthropology and literary/cultural studies and, in doing so, introduces a series of key terms from linguistic anthropology and its way of studying language-in-use as a locus in which culture happens: nonreferential (or social) indexicality, entextualization, and metapragmatics. It establishes a set of common attitudes toward language and cultural production found in work by Bourdieu, Bakhtin, and a number of linguistic anthropologists (Michael Silverstein in particular). It suggests three analytical levels on which such an interdisciplinary encounter might take place: analysis of (1) works that themselves show an interest in language-in-use (for example, novels by writers such as Proust, Eliot, or Dostoevsky); (2) the “interactive text,” of which any given literary artifact could be said to be a precipitate (one construal of Bourdieu’s approach to an author like Flaubert); and (3) the role of the ongoing uptake of given language-based artifacts in maintaining and altering their meanings and values.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Michael R. Lucey
Tom McEnaney
Representations
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lucey et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a46eb0e219f8cdd347fff — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2017.137.1.1