Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of augmented reality (AR) as an e-commerce tool using two products — sunglasses and watches. Study 1 explores the effectiveness of AR by comparing it to a conventional website. The results show that AR provides effective communication benefits by generating greater novelty, immersion, enjoyment, and usefulness, resulting in positive attitudes toward medium and purchase intention, compared to the web-based product presentations. Study 2 compares the paths by which consumers evaluate products through AR versus web with a focus on interactivity and vividness. It is revealed that immersion mediates the relationship between interactivity/vividness and two outcome variables — usefulness and enjoyment in the AR condition compared to the web condition where no significant paths between interactivity and immersion and between previous media experience and media novelty are found. Participants’ subjective opinions about AR are examined through opinion mining to better understand consumer responses to AR.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mark Yi‐Cheon Yim
University of Massachusetts Lowell
Shu‐Chuan Chu
DePaul University
Paul Sauer
Buffalo State University
Journal of Interactive Marketing
University of Massachusetts Lowell
DePaul University
Canisius College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yim et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d727d3424c1fc5df563c20 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.04.001
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: