Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This article identifies, and offers several ways to address, a serious, persistent issue in conservation: low levels of diversity in thought and action. We first describe the lack of diversity and highlight the continued separation of the environmental conservation and environmental justice movements. We then offer—based on previous research and our collective experience—two suggestions for how to increase inclusivity (a step farther than increasing diversity) in holistic ways. We suggest that embracing narrative, including historical narrative that can be profound and painful, may be essential to addressing this deeply rooted issue. We also suggest the need to redefine “environment” to more closely align with the diversity of perspectives that different people and disciplines bring to the topic. We support our suggestions with selected data from empirical research and provide examples of initiatives that embody them.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rachelle K. Gould
University of Vermont
Indira Phukan
Mary E. Mendoza
Conservation Letters
Stanford University
University of Vermont
Cardiovascular Institute of the South
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gould et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d94d799873513554835da5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12431
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: