Patients with HFpEF had significantly lower coronary flow reserve (2.55 vs. 3.84, P=0.024) and higher index of microvascular resistance (26.7 vs. 19.7, P=0.037) than control subjects.
Observational (n=44)
Do patients with HFpEF have higher rates of coronary microvascular dysfunction compared to controls without HFpEF?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.55% vs 3.84%
p-value: p=0.024
There are multiple proposed mechanisms for the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We hypothesized that coronary microvascular dysfunction is common in these patients. In a prospective, observational study, patients undergoing cardiac catheterization with HFpEF left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≥ 50% and with clinical HF were compared with similar patients without HFpEF. Patients with ≥50% stenosis were excluded, and coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) were measured after adenosine administration using a guidewire, with CFR ≤ 2 and IMR ≥ 23 being abnormal. Baseline characteristics and CFR and IMR were compared in 30 HFpEF patients and 14 control subjects. Compared with control subjects, HFpEF patients were older (65.4 ± 9.6 vs. 55.1 ± 3.1 yr, P < 0.01), had higher numbers of comorbidities (4.4 ± 1.5 vs. 2.6 ± 1.9, P = 0.002), had higher median B-type natriuretic peptide 161 (interquartile range: 75-511) pg/dl vs. 37 (interquartile range: 18.5-111) pg/dl, P < 0.01, and had higher LV end-diastolic pressure (17.8 ± 4.2 vs. 8.4 ± 4.2, P < 0.01). HFpEF patients had lower CFR (2.55 ± 1.60 vs. 3.84 ± 1.89, P = 0.024) and higher IMR (26.7 ± 10.3 vs. 19.7 ± 9.7 units, P = 0.037) than control subjects. Most (71.4%) control subjects had normal coronary physiology, whereas 36.7% of HFpEF patients had both abnormal CFR and IMR and another 36.7% had either abnormal CFR or IMR. In conclusion, this is the first study that has reported invasively determined CFR and IMR in HFpEF patients. We demonstrated the presence of four distinct coronary physiology groups in HFpEF patients. Investigation into the potential mechanisms for these findings is needed. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this prospective observational study of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), we found that patients with HFpEF had more abnormalities of coronary flow and resistance than asymptomatic control patients, indicating that coronary microvascular dysfunction may play a role in the HFpEF disease process.
Dryer et al. (Fri,) conducted a observational in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=44). Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) vs. Patients without HFpEF was evaluated on Coronary flow reserve (CFR) (p=0.024). Patients with HFpEF had significantly lower coronary flow reserve (2.55 vs. 3.84, P=0.024) and higher index of microvascular resistance (26.7 vs. 19.7, P=0.037) than control subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: