Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Therapists perceive many benefits to using feedback-based technologies in rehabilitation but view it as an addition rather than an alternative to usual therapy. Input from therapists was perceived to be needed for technology to achieve therapeutic benefit. Technology use in practice may be influenced by design limitations or the available support to access and use the technology. Implications for Rehabilitation Therapists perceive technology can be used for benefit as an adjunct to usual therapy with the skilled input of a therapist to assess and monitor patient performance to ensure the "right" quality and quantity of movements for recovery. Technology prescription requires an investment of time and a tailored approach so that its use meets the needs of the individual patient. Support for training, evidence of effectiveness and access to technology is imperative for implementation in practice. Therapists need to work collaboratively with technology developers to improve the design and usability of technologies to better support the rehabilitation process.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Caitlin Hamilton
The University of Queensland
Meryl Lovarini
The University of Sydney
Annie McCluskey
The University of Sydney
Disability and Rehabilitation
The University of Sydney
Macquarie University
Institute for Musculoskeletal Health
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hamilton et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69fce05bf9b1bbfa2c26fe9e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1446187