Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
A number of tensions have been suggested between stakeholder theory and strategic management (SM). Following a brief review of the histories of stakeholder theory and mainstream SM, we argue that many of the tensions are more apparent than real, representing different narratives about stakeholder theory, SM, business, and ethics. Part of the difference in these two theoretical positions is due to the fact that they seek to solve different problems. However, we suggest how there are areas of overlap, and we argue that some of the tensions may, instead, provide interesting ways to put the two areas of scholarship and practice together. We maintain that SM and stakeholder theory could mutually benefit from a more pragmatist philosophy.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
R. Edward Freeman
University of Virginia
Robert A. Phillips
University of Richmond
Rajendra Sisodia
Capital University
Business & Society
University of Virginia
York University
Babson College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Freeman et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8427e617ce96c42ae367f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318773750