Current risk stratification strategies for stroke in atrial fibrillation, such as the CHA2DS2-VASc score, have several limitations that need to be addressed to improve clinical use.
This review highlights the strengths and limitations of current stroke risk stratification strategies, such as the CHA2DS2-VASc score, in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Despite the demonstrable success of oral anticoagulants in reducing the rate of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, they continue to be seriously underutilized. Indications for their use as stated in the guidelines incorporate a number of risk score algorithms, the most widely used being the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Nonetheless there are several limitations to the various scores currently in clinical use and a critique of these is the focus of this review. In this review we discuss the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation and its role in thromboembolic stroke risk. We amalgamate this with the basis of major professional society anticoagulation recommendations with regards to the strengths and limitations of current risk stratification strategies and discuss gaps in our current evidence base and next steps to address those gaps.
Killu et al. (Thu,) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Risk stratification strategies (e.g., CHA2DS2-VASc score) was evaluated. Current risk stratification strategies for stroke in atrial fibrillation, such as the CHA2DS2-VASc score, have several limitations that need to be addressed to improve clinical use.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: