Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce hospitalization and healthcare costs in stable patients with HFrEF compared to ACEI/ARB?
In a real-world retrospective cohort, sacubitril/valsartan was associated with a lower risk of HF hospitalization and lower total healthcare costs compared to ACEI/ARB in patients with HFrEF.
Background Outcomes data among patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction treated with sacubitril/valsartan (SAC / VAL) are largely limited to clinical trial results. We compared hospitalization and healthcare costs among real-world patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction treated with SAC / VAL versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ACEI / ARB). Methods and Results Using retrospective administrative claims data, stable patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction treated with SAC / VAL or ACEI / ARB from October 2015 to June 2016 were identified. Postindex hospitalization and healthcare costs were assessed in propensity-matched cohorts using robust variance estimation. Time to first hospitalization was modeled using unadjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable models. Postindex all-cause healthcare costs were modeled using an adjusted multivariable model. Among 279 patients per matched cohort, postindex hospitalization risk was lower for SAC / VAL compared with ACEI / ARB using Kaplan-Meier estimation and unadjusted Cox models. For HF hospitalization, the hazard ratio (95% CI) was 0. 56 (0. 33-0. 94; P=0. 030). Adjusted results were similar to unadjusted. Mean (SD) monthly healthcare costs were lower for SAC / VAL versus ACEI / ARB for all categories except pharmacy, with hospital costs being particularly disparate between cohorts: for HF hospitalization, 248 (1588) for SAC / VAL versus 1122 (7290) for ACEI / ARB. The adjusted risk of incurring increased all-cause postindex costs was lower for SAC / VAL versus ACEI / ARB (cost ratio 95% CI 0. 74 0. 59-0. 94; P=0. 013). Conclusions In clinical practice, patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction treated with SAC / VAL were less likely to be hospitalized than matched patients treated with ACEI / ARB. Despite higher pharmacy costs, SAC / VAL -treated patients incurred lower monthly medical and total healthcare costs.
Albert et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: