Rosette cardiac MR fingerprinting yielded comparable T1 but 2-3 ms higher T2 values in the myocardium of healthy subjects compared to the original spiral method, with significant fat suppression.
Rosette cMRF enables simultaneous water-fat separation and myocardial T1/T2 quantification, potentially improving tissue characterization in a single scan.
Purpose This work aims to develop an approach for simultaneous water–fat separation and myocardial T 1 and T 2 quantification based on the cardiac MR fingerprinting (cMRF) framework with rosette trajectories at 3T and 1.5T. Methods Two 15‐heartbeat cMRF sequences with different rosette trajectories designed for water–fat separation at 3T and 1.5T were implemented. Water T 1 and T 2 maps, water image, and fat image were generated with B 0 inhomogeneity correction using a B 0 map derived from the cMRF data themselves. The proposed water–fat separation rosette cMRF approach was validated in the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/National Institute of Standards and Technology MRI system phantom and water/oil phantoms. It was also applied for myocardial tissue mapping of healthy subjects at both 3T and 1.5T. Results Water T 1 and T 2 values measured using rosette cMRF in the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/National Institute of Standards and Technology phantom agreed well with the reference values. In the water/oil phantom, oil was well suppressed in the water images and vice versa. Rosette cMRF yielded comparable T 1 but 2~3 ms higher T 2 values in the myocardium of healthy subjects than the original spiral cMRF method. Epicardial fat deposition was also clearly shown in the fat images. Conclusion Rosette cMRF provides fat images along with myocardial T 1 and T 2 maps with significant fat suppression. This technique may improve visualization of the anatomical structure of the heart by separating water and fat and could provide value in diagnosing cardiac diseases associated with fibrofatty infiltration or epicardial fat accumulation. It also paves the way toward comprehensive myocardial tissue characterization in a single scan.
Liu et al. (Mon,) conducted a other in Healthy subjects. Rosette cardiac MR fingerprinting (cMRF) vs. Original spiral cMRF method was evaluated on Myocardial T1 and T2 quantification and water-fat separation. Rosette cardiac MR fingerprinting yielded comparable T1 but 2-3 ms higher T2 values in the myocardium of healthy subjects compared to the original spiral method, with significant fat suppression.