Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Lins, Servaes and Tamayo (2017) (LST) show that during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) US firms with high corporate social responsibility (CSR) ratings increased in value relative to firms with low CSR ratings. Our study raises questions about the internal and external validity of the inferences in LST. For a similar sample of US stocks, we find no evidence that high CSR firms outperformed low CSR firms during the GFC when we use a calendar‐time portfolio analysis that controls for industry, or uses value‐weighted portfolios. For a sample of Japanese stocks, we also fail to confirm the results reported in LST.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Berkman et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a007df8f9e1acab462d70dd — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12721
Henk Berkman
Michelle Li
Helen Lu
Accounting and Finance
University of Auckland
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: