Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
An emerging consensus in marketing is that consumers respond to price relative to some standard or reference price. Most researchers modeling brand choice have reasoned that this standard is based on past prices of the brand. The authors argue that consumers do use reference prices, but one that is also based on context—other prices in the store—rather than on past prices alone. An analysis of households’ brand choices in two subcategories and over three cities supports this premise. Within context, the lowest price seems to be an important cue for reference price, whereas within time, a brand's own past prices seem to be the most important cue. Households’ use of a contextual reference price also varies predictably across some consumer characteristics. Though their model can be applied to other categories, the findings have important managerial implications: Managerial focus on temporal reference prices could lead to an everyday high price, whereas focus on contextual reference prices could lead to an everyday low price. Only the inclusion of both contextual and temporal reference prices justifies variable pricing.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
K. N. Rajendran
University of Northern Iowa
Gerard J. Tellis
University of Southern California
Journal of Marketing
University of Southern California
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rajendran et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0300c2c8c4199b329e35c0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800102