Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Uberization has emerged as a platform-based form of organizing that is reshaping work and labour markets and that is fundamentally challenging existing thinking on organizing. We suggest that organizational theorists have been reluctant to address the constitutive relation between technology and organizing. By emphasizing co-constitution, we argue against viewing technology as an entity that is separate, exogenous, or causal. Instead, we offer that technology can be fruitfully viewed as endogenous to and constitutively entwined with organizational actions and structures. To illustrate this co-constitution, we present a brief analysis of Uberization from a regime of organizing perspective that emphasizes how organizing practices, valuation schemes, authority arrangements and technological arrangements are entwined with each other. We conclude with an invitation to organizational theorists to more specifically engage with technology as they theorize new forms of organizing.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Samer Faraj
McGill University
Stella Pachidi
King's College London
Organization Theory
University of Cambridge
McGill University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Faraj et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0255deae9e17158c11a443 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787721995205
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: