Left bundle branch pacing compared to left ventricular septal myocardial pacing increases interventricular dyssynchrony but accelerates left ventricular lateral wall depolarization

BackgroundNonselective His-bundle pacing (nsHBp), nonselective left bundle branch pacing (nsLBBp), and left ventricular septal myocardial pacing (LVSP) are recognized as physiological pacing techniques.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare differences in ventricular depolarization between these techniques using ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography (UHF-ECG).MethodsIn patients with bradycardia, nsHBp, nsLBBp (confirmed concomitant left bundle branch LBB and myocardial capture), and LVSP (pacing in left ventricular LV septal position without proven LBB capture) were performed. Timings of ventricular activations in precordial leads were displayed using UHF-ECG, and electrical dyssynchrony (e-DYS) was calculated as the difference between the first and last activation. Duration of local depolarization (Vd) was determined as width of the UHF-QRS complex at 50% of its amplitude.ResultsIn 68 patients, data were collected during nsLBBp (35), LVSP (96), and nsHBp (55). nsLBBp resulted in larger e-DYS than did LVSP and nsHBp – 24 ms (–28;–19) vs –12 ms (–16;–9) vs 10 ms (7;14), respectively; P <.001. nsLBBp produced similar values of Vd in leads V5–V8 (36-43 ms vs 38-43 ms; P = NS in all leads) but longer Vd in leads V1–V4 (47–59 ms vs 41–44 ms; P <.05) as nsHBp. LVSP caused prolonged Vd in leads V1–V8 compared to nsHBp and longer Vd in leads V5–V8 compared to nsLBBp (44–51 ms vs 36–43 ms; P <.05) regardless of R-wave peak time in lead V5 or QRS morphology in lead V1 present during LVSP.Conclusionnslbbp preserves physiological LV depolarization but increases interventricular electrical dyssynchrony. LV lateral wall depolarization during LVSP is prolonged, but interventricular synchrony is preserved. Nonselective His-bundle pacing (nsHBp), nonselective left bundle branch pacing (nsLBBp), and left ventricular septal myocardial pacing (LVSP) are recognized as physiological pacing techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare differences in ventricular depolarization between these techniques using ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography (UHF-ECG). In patients with bradycardia, nsHBp, nsLBBp (confirmed concomitant left bundle branch LBB and myocardial capture), and LVSP (pacing in left ventricular LV septal position without proven LBB capture) were performed. Timings of ventricular activations in precordial leads were displayed using UHF-ECG, and electrical dyssynchrony (e-DYS) was calculated as the difference between the first and last activation. Duration of local depolarization (Vd) was determined as width of the UHF-QRS complex at 50% of its amplitude. In 68 patients, data were collected during nsLBBp (35), LVSP (96), and nsHBp (55). nsLBBp resulted in larger e-DYS than did LVSP and nsHBp – 24 ms (–28;–19) vs –12 ms (–16;–9) vs 10 ms (7;14), respectively; P <.001. nsLBBp produced similar values of Vd in leads V5–V8 (36-43 ms vs 38-43 ms; P = NS in all leads) but longer Vd in leads V1–V4 (47–59 ms vs 41–44 ms; P <.05) as nsHBp. LVSP caused prolonged Vd in leads V1–V8 compared to nsHBp and longer Vd in leads V5–V8 compared to nsLBBp (44–51 ms vs 36–43 ms; P <.05) regardless of R-wave peak time in lead V5 or QRS morphology in lead V1 present during LVSP. nslbbp preserves physiological LV depolarization but increases interventricular electrical dyssynchrony. LV lateral wall depolarization during LVSP is prolonged, but interventricular synchrony is preserved.