In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, a higher Trial Score (≥1.14) predicted significant clinical benefit from spironolactone (βinteraction = -0.28, P < 0.01).
Observational (n=3,820)
Yes
Does a composite Trial Score predict clinical benefit from spironolactone in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
A novel composite Trial Score based on 9 routine clinical variables can identify patients with HFpEF who are most likely to derive clinical benefit from spironolactone therapy.
Effect estimate: βinteraction -0.28
p-value: p=<0.01
AIMS: The TOPCAT trial showed no benefit for spironolactone in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Post-hoc, spironolactone helped participants from the Americas, but not Eastern Europe. Determining which patients with HFpEF could respond like TOPCAT's responders should help guide their care. We aimed to develop a TOPCAT Trial Score (TS) as a composite metric to identify such patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: FPEF scores (≥3). The cohort of real-world patients with HFpEF had even higher TS than American TOPCAT participants. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HFpEF can be quantified by the TS to capture the likelihood of benefit from spironolactone.
Belkin et al. (Sun,) conducted a observational in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=3,820). Spironolactone vs. Placebo was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular mortality, aborted cardiac arrest, or heart failure hospitalization (βinteraction -0.28, p=<0.01). In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, a higher Trial Score (≥1.14) predicted significant clinical benefit from spironolactone (βinteraction = -0.28, P < 0.01).