Ideal cardiovascular health, but not sleep duration or sleep debt, was associated with a lower prevalence of high-risk hsCRP (PR 0.60; 95% CI 0.48-0.75).
Cross-Sectional (n=4,027)
Yes
Does ideal cardiovascular health or sleep duration improve systemic inflammation (hsCRP) in cardiovascular disease-free adults?
In a nationally representative US sample, ideal cardiovascular health, but not sleep duration or sleep debt, was associated with lower systemic inflammation as measured by hsCRP.
Relative Risk: 0.6 (95% CI 0.48–0.75)
There is conflicting evidence regarding the associations between sleep deprivation and inflammatory biomarkers indicative of cardiovascular disease risk, such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). The association between sleep habits and hsCRP was quantified in a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States and mediation by ideal cardiovascular health metrics was explored. A cross-sectional analysis of cardiovascular disease-free participants aged 20-79 years from the 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey was conducted. The primary exposures were self-reported sleep duration, sleep debt (difference between the average weekday and weekend sleep duration), and ideal cardiovascular health (11-14 points). The primary outcome was hsCRP (high-risk ≥ 3.0 mg/L). Multivariable robust Poisson models were used to estimate prevalence ratios after multiple imputation. A subgroup analysis of shift workers was also conducted. Of 4027 participants included (mean age 46 years; 52% female; 41% shift workers), the prevalence of sleeping <6 h on weekdays was 9%, with 40% sleeping ≥9 h on weekends. One-quarter had a high (≥2 h) sleep debt, 82% had poor cardiovascular health, and 34% had high-risk hsCRP. There were no significant associations between weekday sleep duration or sleep debt with high-risk hsCRP, even among shift workers. Mediation analysis was not conducted. Ideal cardiovascular health was associated with a lower prevalence of high-risk hsCRP (prevalence ratios, 0.60, 95% CI, 0.48-0.75). The lack of significant associations suggests a complex interrelationship of hsCRP with factors beyond sleep duration. Examination of populations at highest risk of chronic sleep deprivation could help to elucidate the association with systemic inflammation-related outcomes.
Cash et al. (Sat,) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease-free (n=4,027). Sleep duration, sleep debt, and ideal cardiovascular health vs. Poor cardiovascular health / normal sleep was evaluated on High-risk hsCRP (≥ 3.0 mg/L) (PR 0.60, 95% CI 0.48-0.75). Ideal cardiovascular health, but not sleep duration or sleep debt, was associated with a lower prevalence of high-risk hsCRP (PR 0.60; 95% CI 0.48-0.75).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: