Trained Female Community Health Volunteers accurately performed cardiovascular disease risk screening with a 94.5% agreement (Kappa 0.77) compared to registered medical doctors.
Cross-Sectional (n=491)
No
Can trained Female Community Health Volunteers accurately perform cardiovascular disease risk screening compared to medical doctors in adults in Nepal?
Trained Female Community Health Volunteers in Nepal can accurately perform cardiovascular disease risk screening using WHO prediction charts, demonstrating high agreement with medical doctors.
Effect estimate: Kappa 0.77 (95% CI 0.705-0.835)
p-value: p=<0.001
INTRODUCTION: Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) have become the leading public health problems worldwide and the cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) is one of the major NCDs. Female Community Health Volunteers (FCHVs) in Nepal are the key drivers to implementing frontline health services. We explored the potential for engaging FCHVs for CVD risk screening at the community level in Nepal. METHODS: We used multiple approaches (quantitative and qualitative) for data collection. The trained FCHVs administered CVD risk screening questionnaire among 491 adults in rural and urban areas and calculated the CVD risk scores. To maintain consistency and quality, a registered medical doctor also, using the same risk scoring chart, independently calculated the CVD risk scores. Kappa statistics and concordance coefficient were used to compare these two sets of risk screening results. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were conducted. Two focus group discussions among the FCHVs were conducted to determine their experiences with CVD risk screening and willingness to engage with CVD prevention and control efforts. RESULTS: The mean level of agreement between two sets of risk screening results was 94.5% (Kappa = 0.77, P<0.05). Sensitivity of FCHV screening was 90.3% (95% CI: 0.801-0.964); and the specificity was 97% (95% CI: 0.948, 0.984). FCHVs who participated in the FGDs expressed a strong enthusiasm and readiness to using the CVD risk screening tools. Despite their busy workload, all FCHVs showed high level of motivation and willingness in using CVD risk screening tools and contribute to the prevention and control efforts of NCDs. The FCHVs recommended needs for providing additional training and capacity building opportunities. CONCLUSION: We conclude that there is a potential for engaging FCHVs to use simple CVD risk screening tools at the community level. The findings are promising, however, further studies engaging larger number of FCHVs and larger population would warrant feasibility of such tools within the existing healthcare systems in Nepal.
Rawal et al. (Thu,) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease risk (n=491). CVD risk screening by Female Community Health Volunteers (FCHVs) vs. CVD risk screening by a registered medical doctor was evaluated on Agreement between FCHVs' and doctor's CVD risk screening scores (Kappa 0.77, 95% CI 0.705-0.835, p=<0.001). Trained Female Community Health Volunteers accurately performed cardiovascular disease risk screening with a 94.5% agreement (Kappa 0.77) compared to registered medical doctors.