Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Excessive water and chemicals are often used in biomass valorization because of postpretreatment washing and wastewater treatment. To address this issue, three pretreatment scenarios (I: H2SO4 pretreatment with NaOH neutralization; II: NaOH pretreatment with H2SO4 neutralization; and III: parallel H2SO4 and NaOH pretreatments following their integration) with enzymatic hydrolysis were performed for glucose, xylose, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), and furfural production at high solid (15 and 25%, w/v) loading without solid–liquid separation and further detoxification. With an initial solid loading of 25% (w/v), scenario I reached the highest furfural (4. 94 g/L) and HMF (2. 82 g/L) concentrations, scenario II achieved the highest glucose (73. 25%) and xylose (77. 49%) yields, while scenario III displayed the highest sugar concentration (74. 53 g/L). Only the hydrolysate from NaOH pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis with 10% initial solid loading can be efficiently fermented to ethanol (17. 92 g/L) by the traditional yeast. Technoeconomic analysis showed that hydrolase unit cost (2. 00–10. 00/kg) notably governs the capital investment and annual operating cost. The lower annual glucose 197. 28 thousand metric tons (TMt) and xylose (52. 11 TMt) output with sugar revenue of 255. 05 million for scenario I was compensated by HMF (6. 98 TMt) and furfural (10. 31 TMt) output with furan revenue of 80. 11 million. Scenario II had the higher annual glucose (208. 46 TMt) and xylose (71. 19 TMt) output than scenario III (glucose: 206. 04 TMt; xylose: 65. 32 TMt), but its total revenue (286. 01 million) was notably lower than scenario III (330. 71 million). This indicates that furans play a critical role in determining the potential value of the hydrolysate. A sugar minimum selling price of 2013. 23/Mt was achieved by scenario III with the hydrolase unit cost of 4. 00/kg. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the hydrolase unit cost was a dominating factor determining the sugar minimum selling price.
Zhao et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: