QRS duration was associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (HR 1.030 per 1-ms increase; 95% CI 1.017-1.043), whereas the JTc interval had no independent prognostic value.
Cohort (n=20,058)
Yes
Are QRS, QTc, and JTc intervals associated with sudden cardiac death in the general population?
Prolonged QRS and QTc intervals are associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death, but the repolarization component (JTc) has no independent prognostic value.
Effect estimate: HR 1.030 (95% CI 1.017-1.043)
BackgroundQRS duration and corrected QT (QTc) interval have been associated with sudden cardiac death (SCD), but no data are available on the significance of repolarization component (JTc interval) of the QTc interval as an independent risk marker in the general population.ObjectiveIn this study, we sought to quantify the risk of SCD associated with QRS, QTc, and JTc intervals.MethodsThis study was conducted using data from 3 population cohorts from different eras, comprising a total of 20,058 individuals. The follow-up period was limited to 10 years and age at baseline to 30–61 years. QRS duration and QT interval (Bazett’s) were measured from standard 12-lead electrocardiograms at baseline. JTc interval was defined as QTc interval – QRS duration. Cox proportional hazards models that controlled for confounding clinical factors identified at baseline were used to estimate the relative risk of SCD.ResultsDuring a mean period of 9.7 years, 207 SCDs occurred (1.1 per 1000 person-years). QRS duration was associated with a significantly increased risk of SCD in each cohort (pooled hazard ratio HR 1.030 per 1-ms increase; 95% confidence interval CI 1.017–1.043). The QTc interval had borderline to significant associations with SCD and varied among cohorts (pooled HR 1.007; 95% CI 1.001–1.012). JTc interval as a continuous variable was not associated with SCD (pooled HR 1.001; 95% CI 0.996–1.007).ConclusionProlonged QRS durations and QTc intervals are associated with an increased risk of SCD. However, when the QTc interval is deconstructed into QRS and JTc intervals, the repolarization component (JTc) appears to have no independent prognostic value. QRS duration and corrected QT (QTc) interval have been associated with sudden cardiac death (SCD), but no data are available on the significance of repolarization component (JTc interval) of the QTc interval as an independent risk marker in the general population. In this study, we sought to quantify the risk of SCD associated with QRS, QTc, and JTc intervals. This study was conducted using data from 3 population cohorts from different eras, comprising a total of 20,058 individuals. The follow-up period was limited to 10 years and age at baseline to 30–61 years. QRS duration and QT interval (Bazett’s) were measured from standard 12-lead electrocardiograms at baseline. JTc interval was defined as QTc interval – QRS duration. Cox proportional hazards models that controlled for confounding clinical factors identified at baseline were used to estimate the relative risk of SCD. During a mean period of 9.7 years, 207 SCDs occurred (1.1 per 1000 person-years). QRS duration was associated with a significantly increased risk of SCD in each cohort (pooled hazard ratio HR 1.030 per 1-ms increase; 95% confidence interval CI 1.017–1.043). The QTc interval had borderline to significant associations with SCD and varied among cohorts (pooled HR 1.007; 95% CI 1.001–1.012). JTc interval as a continuous variable was not associated with SCD (pooled HR 1.001; 95% CI 0.996–1.007). Prolonged QRS durations and QTc intervals are associated with an increased risk of SCD. However, when the QTc interval is deconstructed into QRS and JTc intervals, the repolarization component (JTc) appears to have no independent prognostic value.
Tikkanen et al. (Mon,) conducted a cohort in General population (n=20,058). QRS, QTc, and JTc intervals was evaluated on Sudden cardiac death (SCD) (HR 1.030, 95% CI 1.017-1.043). QRS duration was associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (HR 1.030 per 1-ms increase; 95% CI 1.017-1.043), whereas the JTc interval had no independent prognostic value.