The TARGET-HF prediction model achieved a C-statistic of 0.853 for detecting incident heart failure, significantly outperforming an existing hospital-based model and age alone.
Cohort (n=31,905)
Yes
31,905 patients aged 35 years or older presenting to general practice with dyspnoea or peripheral oedema, followed for up to 10 years to detect incident heart failure.
TARGET-HF prediction model vs Goyal et al. outpatient model and age alone
Discrimination of incident heart failure (C-statistic) on the validation set — C-statistic 0.853 (0.834-0.872), p=<0.001
Effect estimate: C-statistic 0.853 (95% CI 0.834-0.872)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.853% vs 0.824%
p-value: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND: Timely diagnosis of heart failure (HF) is essential to optimize treatment opportunities that improve symptoms, quality of life, and survival. While most patients consult their general practitioner (GP) prior to HF, the early stages of HF may be difficult to identify. An integrated clinical support tool may aid in identifying patients at high risk of HF. We therefore constructed a prediction model using routine health care data. METHODS: Our study involved a dynamic cohort of patients (≥35 years) who consulted their GP with either dyspnoea and/or peripheral oedema within the Amsterdam metropolitan area from 2011 to 2020. The outcome of interest was incident HF, verified by an expert panel. We developed a regularized, cause-specific multivariable proportional hazards model (TARGET-HF). The model was evaluated with bootstrapping on an isolated validation set and compared to an existing model developed with hospital insurance data as well as patient age as a sole predictor. RESULTS: Data from 31,905 patients were included (40% male, median age 60 years) of whom 1,301 (4.1%) were diagnosed with HF over 124,676 person-years of follow-up. Data were allocated to a development (n = 25,524) and validation (n = 6,381) set. TARGET-HF attained a C-statistic of 0.853 (95% CI, 0.834 to 0.872) on the validation set, which proved to provide a better discrimination than C = 0.822 for age alone (95% CI, 0.801 to 0.842, P < 0.001) and C = 0.824 for the hospital-based model (95% CI, 0.802 to 0.843, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The TARGET-HF model illustrates that routine consultation codes can be used to build a performant model to identify patients at risk for HF at the time of GP consultation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lukas De Clercq
GGD Amsterdam
Martijn J. Schut
Amsterdam University Medical Centers
Patrick M. Bossuyt
Amsterdam University Medical Centers
Family Practice
University of Amsterdam
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Clercq et al. (Fri,) conducted a cohort in Incident heart failure in symptomatic patients (n=31,905). TARGET-HF prediction model vs. Goyal et al. outpatient model and age alone was evaluated on Discrimination of incident heart failure (C-statistic) on the validation set (C-statistic 0.853, 95% CI 0.834-0.872, p=<0.001). The TARGET-HF prediction model achieved a C-statistic of 0.853 for detecting incident heart failure, significantly outperforming an existing hospital-based model and age alone.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a213faaf6aa648d3a57cddb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac069