Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Using text mining to prioritise the order in which items are screened should be considered safe and ready for use in 'live' reviews. The use of text mining as a 'second screener' may also be used cautiously. The use of text mining to eliminate studies automatically should be considered promising, but not yet fully proven. In highly technical/clinical areas, it may be used with a high degree of confidence; but more developmental and evaluative work is needed in other disciplines.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alison O’Mara-Eves
James Thomas
John McNaught
Systematic Reviews
University College London
University of Manchester
University of London
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
O’Mara-Eves et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df72bf44b0122c4f7a1b24 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-5
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: