Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Three pathologic processes are characteristic of Alzheimer disease (AD): β-amyloid, hyperphosphorylated tau, and neurodegeneration. Our understanding of AD is undergoing a transformation due to our ability to measure biomarkers of these processes across different stages of cognitive impairment. There is growing interest in using AD biomarker tests in care and research and, with this, a growing need for guidance on how to return these sensitive results to patients and participants. Here, we propose a 5-step approach informed by clinical and research experience designing and implementing AD biomarker disclosure processes, extant evidence describing how individuals react to AD biomarker information, ethics, law, and the literature on breaking bad news. The clinician should (1) determine the appropriateness of AD biomarker testing and return of results for the particular patient or research participant. If testing is appropriate, the next steps are to (2) provide pretest education and seek consent for testing from the individual and their support person, (3) administer testing, (4) return the results to the individual and their support person, and (5) follow-up to promote the recipient's well-being.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Emily A. Largent
California University of Pennsylvania
Joshua D. Grill
University of California, Irvine
Kyra O’Brien
California University of Pennsylvania
Neurology
University of Pennsylvania
University of California, Irvine
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Largent et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69daa43b84371aa676a3d93e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000206891