Harnessing Generative Artificial Intelligence to Improve Efficiency Among Urologists: Welcome ChatGPT

No AccessJournal of UrologyJU Forum1 May 2023Harnessing Generative Artificial Intelligence to Improve Efficiency Among Urologists: Welcome ChatGPT Andrew T. Gabrielson, Anobel Y. Odisho, and David Canes Andrew T. GabrielsonAndrew T. Gabrielson https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9971-9813 The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland , Anobel Y. OdishoAnobel Y. Odisho Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California Center for Digital Health Innovation, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California , and David CanesDavid Canes *Correspondence: Tufts University School of Medicine, Lahey Institute of Urology, Lahey Hospital E-mail Address: email protected Lahey Institute of Urology, Lahey Hospital 182(5):564-566. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 2. . Association of electronic health record design and use factors with clinician stress and burnout. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(8):e199609. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 3. . H.R.34-114th Congress (2015-2016): 21st Century Cures Act. Accessed June 12, 2022. http://www.congress.gov. Google Scholar 4. Language models are few-shot learners. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2020; 33:1877-1901. Google Scholar 5. Attention is all you need. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2017; 30:6000-6010. Google Scholar 6. LaMDA: language models for dialog applications. arXiv. 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08239. Google Scholar 7. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. arXiv. 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.13138. Google Scholar 8. . The Abilities and Limitations of ChatGPT. Accessed December 10, 2022. https://www.anaconda.com/blog/the-abilities-and-limitations-of-chatgpt. Google Scholar 9. . The digital scribe in clinical practice: a scoping review and research agenda. NPJ Digital Med. 2021; 4(1):57. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 10. . Nonhuman "authors" and implications for the integrity of scientific publication and medical knowledge. JAMA. 2023. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.1344. Crossref, Google Scholar 11. . ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science. 2023; 379(6630):313-313. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar Support: None Conflict of Interest: DC is the founder of Wellprept, LLC; AO has received research support from the Microsoft Turing Academic Program; AG has no relevant relationships to disclose. Ethics Statement: In lieu of a formal ethics committee, the principles of the Helsinki Declaration were followed. This piece was completely conceived and written using our pedestrian human intelligence, and not augmented by any generative artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT. © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue 5May 2023Page: 827-829 Advertisement Copyright E-mail Address: email protected More articles by this author Expand All Support: None Conflict of Interest: DC is the founder of Wellprept, LLC; AO has received research support from the Microsoft Turing Academic Program; AG has no relevant relationships to disclose. Ethics Statement: In lieu of a formal ethics committee, the principles of the Helsinki Declaration were followed. This piece was completely conceived and written using our pedestrian human intelligence, and not augmented by any generative artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT. Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...