Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction significantly reduced all-cause death (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.63-0.92) and cardiovascular death compared to control.
Meta-Analysis (n=4,347)
Myocardial infarction (n=4,347)
Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation vs Control
All-cause death — OR 0.76 (0.63-0.92)
Effect estimate: OR 0.76 (95% CI 0.63-0.92)
Randomized clinical trials of cardiac rehabilitation following myocardial infarction have typically demonstrated a lower mortality in treated patients, but with a statistically significant reduction in only one trial. To overcome the problem of not being able to detect small but clinically important benefits in mortality in randomized clinical trials of exercise and risk factor rehabilitation after myocardial infarction with small numbers of patients, we carried out a meta-analysis on the combined results of ten randomized clinical trials that included 4347 patients (control, 2145 patients; rehabilitation, 2202 patients). The pooled odds ratios of 0.76 (95% confidence intervals, 0.63 to 0.92) for all-cause death and of 0.75 (95% confidence intervals, 0.62 to 0.93) for cardiovascular death were significantly lower in the rehabilitation group than in the control group, with no significant difference for nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction. These results suggest that, for appropriately selected patients, comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation has a beneficial effect on mortality but not on nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction. (JAMA1988;260:945-950)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Neil Oldridge
Preventive Cardiology
JAMA
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Neil Oldridge (Fri,) conducted a meta-analysis in Myocardial infarction (n=4,347). Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation vs. Control was evaluated on All-cause death (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.92). Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction significantly reduced all-cause death (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.63-0.92) and cardiovascular death compared to control.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0909a829af591ab7017435 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410070073031
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: