CRT-D replacement or upgrade was associated with significantly higher 1-year all-cause mortality (10.7% and 11.9%, respectively) compared to ICD exchange (2.8%; p=0.002).
Cohort (n=588)
No
Does CRT-D replacement or upgrade increase 1-year all-cause mortality compared to ICD exchange in patients undergoing pulse generator replacement?
CRT-D replacement or upgrade is associated with higher 1-year mortality compared to ICD exchange, with LVEF ≤ 30%, NYHA class ≥ 3, eGFR ≤ 30, and Hb ≤ 7 identified as independent risk factors for mortality.
Absolute Event Rate: 10.7% vs 2.8%
p-value: p=0.002
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) significantly contribute to the prevention of sudden cardiac death in selected patients. However, it is essential to identify those who are likely to not have benefit from an ICD and to defer a pulse generator exchange. Easily implementable guidelines for individual risk stratification and decision making are lacking. This study investigates the 1-year mortality of patients who underwent an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator function (CRT-D) pulse generator replacement in a contemporary real-world tertiary hospital setting. The cause of death and patient- and procedure-related factors are stratified, and predictive values for 1-year mortality are evaluated. Patients with a follow-up of ≥365 days (or prior mortality) after an ICD or CRT-D exchange at the Leiden University Medical Center from 1 January 2018 until 31 December 2021 were eligible. In total, 588 patients were included (77% male, 69 60–76 years old, 59% primary prevention, 46% ischemic cardiomyopathy and 37% mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)). Patients undergoing a CRT-D replacement or upgrade had a significantly higher 1-year all-cause mortality (10.7% and 11.9%, respectively) compared to patients undergoing ICD (2.8%) exchange (p = 0.002). LVEF ≤ 30%, New York Heart Association class ≥ 3, estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤ 30 mL/min/m2 and haemoglobin ≤ 7 mmol/L were independently associated with mortality within 1 year after pulse generator replacement. There is a growing need for prospectively validated risk scores to weight individualized risk of mortality with the expected ICD therapy benefit and to support a well-informed, shared decision-making process.
Feijen et al. (Wed,) conducted a cohort in ICD or CRT-D pulse generator replacement (n=588). CRT-D replacement or upgrade vs. ICD exchange was evaluated on 1-year all-cause mortality (p=0.002). CRT-D replacement or upgrade was associated with significantly higher 1-year all-cause mortality (10.7% and 11.9%, respectively) compared to ICD exchange (2.8%; p=0.002).