Pulse Entdecken nav.journalClub Debatten Trends Forschende

Join discussions, follow papers, and never miss your next session.

Download on theApp Store

Start Entdecken nav.journalClub Trends

⌘+K

December 27, 2023Open Access

View Full Paper

Affiliation Bias in Peer Review of Abstracts by a Large Language Model

DWDario von WedelBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center RSRico Andre SchmittHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin MTMoritz ThieleHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This study assesses affiliation bias in peer review of medical abstracts by a commonly used large language model.

KI fragen

Like

Bookmark

Share

View Full Paper

KI fragen

Like

Bookmark

Share

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wedel et al. (Wed,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a201a05349f479269fbe36c https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.24641

Affiliation Bias in Peer Review of Abstracts by a Large Language Model | Synapse

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Stop the peer-review treadmill. I want to get off2023 · 72 citations
2Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance2006 · 250 citations
3Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots2023 · 128 citations
4Evaluating the Application of Large Language Models in Clinical Research Contexts2023 · 52 citations
5Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review2023 · 212 citations