Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This study offers a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in the field of second language (L2) teaching and applied linguistics, spanning from the early developments in 1995 to 2022. It aims to uncover current trends, prominent themes, and influential authors, documents, and sources. A total of 185 relevant articles published in Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) indexed journals were analyzed using the VOSviewer bibliometric software tool. Our investigation reveals a highly multidisciplinary and interconnected field, with four main clusters identified: AI, natural language processing (NLP), robot-assisted language learning, and chatbots. Notable themes include the increasing use of intelligent tutoring systems, the importance of syntactic complexity and vocabulary in L2 learning, and the exploration of robots and gamification in language education. The study also highlights the potential of NLP and AI technologies to enhance personalized feedback and instruction for language learners. The findings emphasize the growing interest in AI applications in L2 teaching and applied linguistics, as well as the need for continued research to advance the field and improve language instruction and assessment. By providing a quantitative and rigorous overview of the literature, this study contributes valuable insights into the current state of research in AI-assisted L2 teaching and applied linguistics and identifies key areas for future exploration and development.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Galip Kartal
Yusuf Emre Yeşilyurt
ReCALL
Necmettin Erbakan University
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kartal et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e777acb6db6435876ecaf6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344024000077
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: