Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The paper considers the question of the evolution of the conception of economic space within the approaches of the classical school of the location of productive forces, the gravity model of international trade, the walrasian equilibrium model, as well as institutional analysis. Physicalist metaphors are considered in parallel with this evolution. It is emphasized that economic objects lack clear-cut boundaries, which leads to the problem of ignoring the heterogeneity of space. It is demonstrated that competition within the Walrasian space reduces the degree of heterogeneity, whereas the Coasian space is inherently heterogeneous. The changes in institutional regimes, blurring of property rights and specifying their identification can both decrease and increase transaction costs. it is inferred that the concept of boundaries of objects is of great importance to economic research.
Maxim Yu. Churilin (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: