Alternative P2Y12 inhibitors were associated with lower risk of major atherothrombotic events compared to clopidogrel in CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele carriers with scores ≥10 (HR 0.48; P=0.004).
Cohort (n=4,335)
Does alternative P2Y12 inhibitor therapy reduce major atherothrombotic events compared to clopidogrel in post-PCI patients stratified by ABCD-GENE score and CYP2C19 genotype?
4,335 patients who underwent PCI, CYP2C19 genotyping, and P2Y12 inhibitor treatment, followed for 1 year.
Alternative P2Y12 inhibitor (prasugrel or ticagrelor)
Clopidogrel
Major atherothrombotic events (MAE) within 1 year after PCIcomposite
Alternative P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) are more effective than clopidogrel in CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers after PCI, regardless of their clinical ABCD-GENE score.
Hazard Ratio: 0.89 (95% CI 0.65–1.22)
p-value: p=0.475
BACKGROUND An ABCD-GENE (age, body mass index, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and CYP2C19 genetic variants) score ≥10 predicts reduced clopidogrel effectiveness, but its association with response to alternative therapy remains unclear. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between ABCD-GENE score and the effectiveness of clopidogrel vs alternative P2Y12 inhibitor (prasugrel or ticagrelor) therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS A total of 4,335 patients who underwent PCI, CYP2C19 genotyping, and P2Y12 inhibitor treatment were included. The primary outcome was major atherothrombotic events (MAE) within 1 year after PCI. Cox regression was performed to assess event risk in clopidogrel-treated (reference) vs alternatively treated patients, with stabilized inverse probability weights derived from exposure propensity scores after stratifying by ABCD-GENE score and further by CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) genotype. RESULTS Among patients with scores <10 (n = 3,200), MAE was not different with alternative therapy vs clopidogrel (weighted HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.65-1.22; P = 0.475). The risk for MAE also did not significantly differ by treatment among patients with scores ≥10 (n = 1,135; weighted HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.51-1.11; P = 0.155). Among CYP2C19 LOF allele carriers, MAE risk appeared lower with alternative therapy in both the group with scores <10 (weighted HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.25-1.01; P = 0.052) and the group with scores ≥10 (weighted HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.29-0.80; P = 0.004), while there was no difference in the group with scores <10 and no LOF alleles (weighted HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.70-1.51; P = 0.885). CONCLUSIONS These data support the use of alternative therapy over clopidogrel in CYP2C19 LOF allele carriers after PCI, regardless of ABCD-GENE score, while clopidogrel is as effective as alternative therapy in non-LOF patients with scores <10.
“One of the problems with genotyping is that genotypes don't explain all the reasons for why a patient may be a clopidogrel nonresponder. There are genetic factors, but there are also nongenetic factors such as clinical factors that contribute to clopidogrel response. So on this background, we thought: why not come up with a scoring system that can improve the accuracy with which we define clopidogrel nonresponse by using both clinical and genetic factors?”
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cameron D. Thomas
University of Florida
Francesco Franchi
Interventional Cardiology
Joseph S. Rossi
Northwestern University
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
University of Florida
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Thomas et al. (Mon,) conducted a cohort in Percutaneous coronary intervention (n=4,335). Alternative P2Y12 inhibitor (prasugrel or ticagrelor) vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Major atherothrombotic events (MAE) within 1 year after PCI (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.65-1.22, p=0.475). Alternative P2Y12 inhibitors were associated with lower risk of major atherothrombotic events compared to clopidogrel in CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele carriers with scores ≥10 (HR 0.48; P=0.004).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1f9d27ca632e8fa1a52ad5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.02.015
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: