Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Delirium is a serious neuropsychiatric syndrome with adverse outcomes, which is common but often undiagnosed in terminally ill people. The 4 ‘A’s test or 4AT ( www.the4AT.com ), a brief delirium detection tool, is widely used in general settings, but validation studies in terminally ill people are lacking. Aim: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the 4AT in detecting delirium in terminally ill people, who are hospice inpatients. Design: A diagnostic test accuracy study in which participants underwent the 4AT and a reference standard based on the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The reference standard was informed by Delirium Rating Scale Revised-98 and tests assessing arousal and attention. Assessments were conducted in random order by pairs of independent raters, blinded to the results of the other assessment. Setting/participants: Two hospice inpatient units in Scotland, UK. Participants were 148 hospice inpatients aged ⩾18 years. Results: A total of 137 participants completed both assessments. Three participants had an indeterminate reference standard diagnosis and were excluded, yielding a final sample of 134. Mean age was 70.3 (SD = 10.6) years. About 33% (44/134) had reference standard delirium. The 4AT had a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI 79%–98%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI 90%–99%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97 (95% CI 0.94–1). Conclusion: The results of this validation study support use of the 4AT as a delirium detection tool in hospice inpatients, and add to the literature evaluating methods of delirium detection in palliative care settings. Trial registry: ISCRTN 97417474.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Elizabeth Arnold
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Anne Finucane
Marie Curie Hospice
Stacey Taylor
Marie Curie Hospice
Palliative Medicine
University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary
Glasgow Caledonian University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Arnold et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6c1d6b6db643587641241 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241242648