Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract BACKGROUND Gliomas are a heterogenous and common cancer in children, adolescents and young adults (CAYA, ages 0-39 years). Little is known about the biologic and clinical implications of gliomas in AYA limiting our ability to appropriately manage these patients. METHODS We compiled a population-based cohort of patients with glioma aged 0-39 years diagnosed between 2000-2020, performed molecular characterization of the tumors and collected clinical data including therapy and long-term outcome. RESULTS A total of 1456 patients, including 873 AYA patients were included. A pathogenic molecular alteration was found in 98% of AYA samples available. Strikingly, pediatric-type mutations were found in 31% of AYA glioma of which 37% were BRAF V600E and 23% FGFR alterations. Important differences were observed between gliomas in children versus AYAs. First, hemispheric tumors were enriched in AYAs compared to midline tumors in children, especially for RAS/MAPK alterations. Second, increased incidence of high grade tumors in AYA compared to children were observed for BRAF V600E and FGFR mutations (p0.0001). In contrast, if these alterations were identified in AYA and the tumor was low grade, outcome was improved for BRAF V600E and FGFR mutant tumors in AYAs compared to pediatrics (for BRAF V600E 5 year PFS 55.6% 10 years, 78.1% for 10-20 years and 87.1% for 10-20 years of age, p=0.0002). Third, a specific time window for transformation was observed for each alteration (BRAF, FGFR, IDH). This correlated with different methylation profiles and transcriptional patterns between early midline and late hemispheric tumors. Increased senescence signatures were observed in older patients with low grade RAS/MAPK driven tumors with superior outcome. CONCLUSIONS Different cell of origin and secondary mutations shape tumor behavior and lead to either transformation or senescence during gliomagenesis in CAYA. These can affect early interventions and tailored approaches for gliomas by age and molecular alteration.
Bennett et al. (Tue,) studied this question.