Intracoronary imaging techniques such as intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography enhance the understanding of coronary pathophysiology and optimize percutaneous coronary intervention.
This review highlights the contemporary landscape, utility, and advancements of intracoronary imaging techniques like IVUS and OCT in guiding PCI and clarifying coronary pathophysiology.
Engaging intracoronary imaging (IC) techniques such as intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography enables the precise description of vessel architecture. These imaging modalities have well-established roles in providing guidance and optimizing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes. Furthermore, IC is increasingly recognized for its diagnostic capabilities, as it has the unique capacity to reveal vessel wall characteristics that may not be apparent through angiography alone. This manuscript thoroughly reviews the contemporary landscape of IC in clinical practice. Focused on current methodologies, the review explores the utility and advancements in IC techniques. Emphasizing their role in clarifying coronary pathophysiology, guiding PCI, and optimizing patient outcomes, the manuscript critically evaluates the strengths and limitations of each modality. Additionally, the integration of IC into routine clinical workflows and its impact on decision-making processes are discussed. By synthesizing the latest evidence, this review provides valuable insights for clinicians, researchers, and healthcare professionals involved in the dynamic field of interventional cardiology.
Mitsis et al. (Fri,) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention. Intracoronary imaging (intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography) was evaluated. Intracoronary imaging techniques such as intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography enhance the understanding of coronary pathophysiology and optimize percutaneous coronary intervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: