Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Burden and psychological distress are higher in informal caregivers (ICs) of people with severe emotional and behavior dysregulation who have been given a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) compared with non‐caregivers. The current cross‐sectional study examines the difference in outcomes of ICs of people with BPD who have received the intervention Family Connections (FC) and who also led interventions for other caregivers (caregiver‐leaders) compared with those who have attended FC but not led caregiver interventions (non‐leader‐FC participants). The sample for this research is from a larger study (Hayes et al., 2023, Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation , 10 , 31). Data for 347 participants who self‐reported receiving FC and completed the McLean Screening Instrument for BPD‐Carer Version, the Brief COPE, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, the Kessler Psychological Distress scale, the WHO‐5 Well‐being Index, and the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale were analyzed. The results found that being a caregiver‐leader was associated with higher positive mental well‐being and lower psychological distress compared with non‐leader‐FC participants. Being a caregiver‐leader was also associated with significantly greater use of the coping strategy of positive reframing and lower use of behavioral disengagement and self‐blame than non‐leader‐FC participants. The study provides preliminary evidence that for those who have received FC, becoming an intervention leader is associated with better outcomes than caregivers who do not become leaders and provides support for caregiver‐led rollout of FC across services.
Hayes et al. (Thu,) studied this question.