Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background and Objectives: The new molecular classification of endometrial cancer continuously changes the management of the disease in every day clinical practice. Lately, FIGO released a new staging system for endometrial cancer, which incorporates molecular sub-stages and subdivides further early-stage disease. The aim of this study is to investigate the differences between the two FIGO staging systems and evaluate the prognostic precision of the new one. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients with endometrial cancer that were fully treated in the 1st Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology, 2012-2023. Patient characteristics, oncological outcome and follow-up information were collected. The primary outcomes were the stage shifts and the survival data. Results: 67 (15.5%) patients had a stage shift and the majority of them concerned early-stage disease and specifically up-shift from 2009 stages IA and IB to 2023 stage IIC. Concerning, survival a better median and 5-year PFS was present in Stage II disease and when compering the prognostic precision of the two FIGO staging systems no significant difference was present. Conclusions: The new 2023 FIGO staging system better distinguishes early-stage endometrial cancer into its prognostic groups and seems to be as precise as the old 2009 FIGO staging system.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dimitrios Tsolakidis
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Dimitrios Zouzoulas
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Iliana Sofianou
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Papageorgiou General Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tsolakidis et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5b27db6db64358754b5a3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202408.1708.v1