Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Purpose This study investigates how organizational control systems induce emotional labor in frontline service employees (FLEs). Drawing on the stimulus–organism–response (S-O-R) theory, we hypothesized that two control systems, an outcome-based control system (OBCS) and a behavior-based control system (BBCS), trigger work engagement rather than organizational dehumanization in FLEs, leading them to choose deep acting rather than surface acting as an emotional labor strategy. Design/methodology/approach This study employed three-wave online surveys conducted 3–4 months apart to assess the time-lagged effects of S-O-R. We measured OBCS, BBCS (stimuli) and control variables at Time 1 (T1); work engagement and organizational dehumanization (organisms) at Time 2 (T2) and emotional labor strategies (responses) at Time 3 (T3). A total of 218 employees completed the T1, T2 and T3 surveys. Findings OBCS increased work engagement, leading to increased deep acting. BBCS enhanced organizational dehumanization, leading to increased surface acting. Post-hoc analysis confirmed that the indirect effect of OBCS on deep acting through work engagement and the mediation effect of BBCS on surface acting through organizational dehumanization were statistically significant. Originality/value This study collected three-wave data to reveal how organizational control systems affect FLEs’ emotional labor in the S-O-R framework. It illustrated how organizations induce FLEs to perform effective emotional strategies by investigating the effects of organizational control systems on their internal states.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Won‐Moo Hur
Inha University
Hyewon Park
Tennessee Technological University
June-ho Chung
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Journal of Service Theory and Practice
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hur et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e59566b6db643587530981 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jstp-12-2023-0322
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: