Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This study investigates and compares various university ranking systems, particularly considering the unique situation of Bangladesh. With the rise of globalization and emphasis on research in the knowledge-based economy, university rankings have gained significant attention. However, different organizations use diverse criteria and methodologies, leading to discrepancies in ranking positions. This research employed a two-phase approach. The first phase involved a systematic literature review focusing on globally used indicators and methodologies for university rankings. This phase revealed that research-related indicators hold the highest weightage (67.93%) in most ranking systems. Subsequently, the second phase utilized active ranking algorithms to explore the findings from the first phase. The study concludes that research output significantly influences a university's ranking and competitiveness globally. Considering Bangladesh's lower publication volume compared to other nations, adopting a ranking system like QS or THEWUR could be beneficial. This system aligns with the global focus on research output and could incentivize research efforts within Bangladeshi universities.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shamima Akter
Tasmia Tarannum
Ashikur Rahman Obhi
East African Scholars Journal of Education Humanities and Literature
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Akter et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e59206b6db64358752d68f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.36349/easjehl.2024.v07i09.001