Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The article examines special principles of administrative procedure. On the basis of a comprehensive system analysis of the official legislation and regulations of the member states of the European Union (Federal Republic of Germany, Estonia, Switzerland), an analysis of the changes in special principles of administration new procedures and prescribed in official administrative legislation. It is noted that in the administrative-legal science the concepts of the principles of administrative-procedural law have not been formally formed. This is the reason for the emergence of a debate about its shift and replacement, the role of the subordinate subdivision of administrative law. Therefore, there is a pressing need to investigate the concept that is basic to Galatian science of administrative law. The approaches to the classification of special principles of the administrative procedure are reviewed and the classification is based on power. The state’s activity is directed towards the process of European integration. This raised the obvious need to bring the legal system up to European standards. This transfers the reform of the law of administrative and administrative-procedural law. It has become more important to reconsider the principles of interaction between public administration and individuals and legal entities, which is reflected in administrative and procedural activities. The following principles are enshrined in the Law of Ukraine “On Administrative Procedure”: the rule of law, legality, fairness of participants in the administrative procedure before the law, publicity, efficiency, immediacy and lack of priority found the effectiveness of the management activities of public authorities and local authorities and gave the ability to citizens to exercise their rights and freedoms . At the same time, the presence of special principles of the administrative procedure does not contribute to the effectiveness of the government’s government, the security of rights and freedoms. Regardless of any different approaches to classification, it is wise to divide these principles into two groups: organizational and functional (axiological) principles.
O.I. Petelka (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: