Abstract C147: Impact of genetic ancestry in triple-negative breast cancer subtypes

Abstract Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive BC subtype characterized by significant molecular and clinical heterogeneity, influenced by genetic, phenotypic, and environmental factors, as well as interactions of the tumor with its surrounding milieu. A significant racial disparity has been observed between African American (AA) and European American (EA) women regarding the incidence and clinical progression of TNBC. TNBC frequently occurs in young parous women who self-identify as AA and in women who harbor a germline BRCA1 mutation. Notably, AA women are diagnosed with TNBC at a younger age and exhibit a higher risk of developing stage IV disease. Studies examining gene expression signatures that distinguish AA and EA TNBC have reported distinct tumor-associated immunologic profiles in AA patients. We have developed a novel cell type-driven subtyping system based on a racially diverse TNBC sample set that identified three TNBC subtypes, each with distinct biology and prognosis: CC1- immune signaling/T-cell response; CC2- pro- migratory/inflammatory; CC3- fatty acid and hormone and nuclear receptor signaling. In this study, we propose to examine ancestry-inferred differences within each TNBC subtype between patients with African and European ancestry. Methods: RNA-Sequencing data for the Louisiana Tumor Registry, a TNBC cohort of 250 diverse women EA: 123 and AA: 127, was obtained from our collaborators at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center. Genetic admixture was performed on 227/250 patients using the method described by Pakstis, A. J. et al. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in pairwise comparisons at p-adj ≤ 0.05. Survival was assessed using log-rank tests. Results: We investigated DEGs within each subtype between patients with 60% African (Aa, n=102) or 60% European ancestry (Ea, n=99) (identified via admixture analysis). In all three subtypes, upregulated genes, and their associated enrichment in Aa were related to immune pathways, while DEGs in Ea patients were related to epithelial cell regulation. In CC1, Aa was associated with the upregulation of immunoglobulin genes involved in immunoglobulin production and antigen recognition, while Ea was associated with the upregulation of embryonic development genes. In CC2, Aa showed enriched complement activation and immunoglobulin genes, while Ea exhibited upregulation of basal cytokeratin and growth factor EGFR. In CC3, Aa was associated with the upregulation of inflammatory genes, whereas Ea showed upregulation of cellular senescence genes. Survival analysis demonstrated favorable outcomes for Aa in CC1 and less favorable outcomes for Aa in CC2. Conclusion: Our study highlights significant ancestry-inferred differences in gene expression within TNBC subtypes, with Aa patients showing immune pathways enrichment and Ea patients exhibiting differential epithelial cell regulation. These findings underscore the importance of considering genetic ancestry in TNBC prognosis and treatment strategies. Citation Format: Zahra Mesrizadeh, Kavitha Mukund, Fokrul Hossain, Jovanny Zabaleta, Denise Danos, Luis De Valle, Xiao-Cheng Wu, Chindo Hicks, Augusto Ochoa, Lucio Miele, Victoria L. Seewaldt, Shankar Subramaniam. Impact of genetic ancestry in triple-negative breast cancer subtypes abstract. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr C147.