The Performance and Associated Risks of the Criteria for Sarcopenic Obesity Proposed by the European Association for the Study of Obesity in a Geriatric Population

Background: There is no gold standard definition of sarcopenic obesity (SO). Our objective is to evaluate the benefit of using the new definition proposed by the European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) in older people. Methods: Data from the Toledo Study of Healthy Aging, a study based on a cohort of community-dwelling older adults, were used. SO was defined according to the EASO and by a composite of the Foundation for the National Institute of Health (FNIH) for the diagnosis of sarcopenia and the WHO’s criteria for obesity (Body Mass Index, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2; waist circumference, >88 cm for women and >102 cm for men). Frailty Frailty Phenotype (FFP) and Frailty Trait Scale-5 (FTS5) and disability (Katz Index) statuses were assessed at baseline and at the follow-up (median 2.99 years). Mortality at a 5-year follow-up was also assessed. The Logistic and Cox regression models were used to assess the associations. Results: Of the 1559 subjects (age 74.79 ± 5.76 years; 45.54% men), 30.15% (EASO/ESPEN) vs. 16.36% (FNIH) met the SO criteria (Kappa = 0.42). SO was associated with the prevalence of frailty by both the EASO’s OR(95%CI): FFP: 1.70 (1.33–2.16); FTS-5 binary: 2.29 (1.60–3.27); β(95%CI): FTS-5 continuous 3.63 (3.00–4.27) and FNIH+WHO’s criteria OR (95%CI): 2.20 (1.61, 3.00). The FNIH + WHO’s criteria were cross-sectionally associated with disability OR: 1.52 (1.07, 2.16); p-value 0.018, while the EASO’s criteria were not. The EASO’s criteria did not show any association at the follow-up, while the FNIH + WHO’s criteria were associated with incident frailty. Conclusions: The EASO’s new criteria for sarcopenic obesity demonstrate moderate agreement with the traditional definition and are cross-sectionally associated with adverse events, but they do not effectively predict the outcomes generally associated with sarcopenic obesity in older adults. Therefore, the performance of the EASO’s criteria in older people raises the need for refinement before recommending it for generalized use in this population.