Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Self-healing group key distribution (SGKD) protocols guarantee the security of group communications by allowing authorized users to independently recover missed previous session keys from the current broadcast without retransmission. However, existing SGKD protocols have flaws: (1) collusion resistance and revocable nodes are both upper-bounded by the degree of polynomials used, (2) the disclosure of personal secrets enables the recovery of group key, (3) temporary revocation of a group member is not possible, and (4) a revoked node may obtain the session key when initiating mutual healing, moreover, a malicious node may cause the recovery of false group keys. To address these limitations, we propose an SGKD protocol using the Chinese remainder theorem (CRT) and Physical Unclonable Function (PUF). Our proposed SGKD protocol generates a PUF-based dynamic secret by stimulating nodes’ PUF using a polynomial-based encrypted challenge. This secret is then employed to retrieve a CRT-based encrypted group key. By combining PUF and CRT, we can generate dynamic secrets on the fly and reduce computation time significantly. Utilizing such a technique, our protocol achieves superior security goals, including resistance to any coalition of group nodes even if nodes’ personal secrets were disclosed. Furthermore, the proposed protocol provides an unlimited number of revocable nodes. Additionally, a revoked node can rejoin its group in later sessions without affecting backward secrecy. Moreover, the protocol provides a backward secrecy guaranteed mutual-healing feature free from desynchronization. Our performance and security analyses (i.e., theorem-based formal analysis, NS3-based experiment, and formal verification using the AVIPSA tool) show that our proposed protocol achieves stronger security goals and better efficiency in terms of computation, communication, and storage costs compared to existing SGKD schemes.
Othman et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: