Continuous blood flow restriction at 80% arterial occlusion during submaximal resistance exercise increased systolic blood pressure by 7 mmHg (95% CI: 4-9) compared to exercise without restriction.
RCT (n=53)
Randomized crossover
Effect estimate: 7 mmHg difference (LL + 80% vs LL) (95% CI 4-9)
p-value: p=0.005
This study investigated the role of the muscle metaboreflex on cardiovascular responses to submaximal resistance exercise using different pressures and modes of blood flow restriction. Fifty-three adults completed six visits. The first visit involved a performance test (two sets of unilateral knee extension exercise until task failure at 30% 1RM) with continuous blood flow restriction (80% arterial occlusion pressure). In subsequent visits, participants performed (1) a nonexercise control (Control), 70% of the repetitions completed in the performance test with the cuff inflated to (2) continuously 80% arterial occlusion (LL + 80%), (3) continuously 40% arterial occlusion (LL + 40%), (4) intermittently 80% arterial occlusion during exercise (LL + 80%Int), and (5) 0 mmHg (LL), in a randomized order. Three minutes of post-exercise circulatory occlusion was employed to assess the muscle metaboreflex activation. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at various time points. The pre-post increase in systolic blood pressure was not greater with LL + 80%Int ( p = 0.987) but was greater with LL + 80% and LL + 40% (LL + 80% > LL + 40%, p = 0.005) than LL by 7 95%CI: 4, 9 and 4 95%CI; 2, 6 mmHg, respectively. Heart rate increased only with LL + 80% over LL and Control ( p 0.468) and heart rate ( p > 0.543) did not differ among exercise conditions from immediate post-exercise to the end of the circulatory occlusion. Systolic/diastolic blood pressure returned to a similar level as Control (∼120, ∼70 mmHg, respectively) immediately after the cuff deflation. Continuous blood flow restriction, especially with higher pressure, accentuates muscle metaboreflex activation, resulting in amplified cardiovascular responses to the exercise.
Yamada et al. (Wed,) conducted a rct in Adults undergoing resistance exercise (n=53). Submaximal resistance exercise with continuous or intermittent blood flow restriction vs. Nonexercise control and exercise with 0 mmHg restriction (LL) was evaluated on Pre-post increase in systolic blood pressure (7 mmHg difference (LL + 80% vs LL), 95% CI 4-9, p=0.005). Continuous blood flow restriction at 80% arterial occlusion during submaximal resistance exercise increased systolic blood pressure by 7 mmHg (95% CI: 4-9) compared to exercise without restriction.