Anxiety disorder (HR 1.62; 95% CI 1.15-2.13) and depression (HR 2.15; 95% CI 1.75-2.64) were associated with incident CVD, mediated by shared lifestyle but distinct metabolic factors.
Cohort (n=254,695)
Yes
Do anxiety disorder and depression increase the risk of incident cardiovascular disease, and what are the mediating lifestyle, physical, and metabolic pathways?
254,695 participants from the UK Biobank evaluated for the association of anxiety disorder and depression with incident cardiovascular disease.
Anxiety disorder and depression (exposures)
Incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) ascertained through linkage to hospital and death recordshard clinical
Anxiety disorder and depression significantly increase the risk of incident cardiovascular disease through shared lifestyle and physical pathways (such as smoking and waist-hip ratio) but distinct metabolic pathways.
Effect estimate: HR 1.62 (anxiety), HR 2.15 (depression) (95% CI 1.15-2.13 (anxiety), 1.75-2.64 (depression))
AIMS: Although anxiety disorder and depression increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, few studies have examined their underlying mechanisms systematically, particularly contrasting the difference between the two of them. Our study aimed to examine the extent to which lifestyle, physical and metabolic factors mediate the associations of anxiety disorder and depression with incident CVD. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted using UK Biobank. Anxiety disorder, depression, and incident CVD were ascertained through linkage to hospital and death records. A causal mediation analysis was performed for anxiety disorder and depression, separately examining multiple potential lifestyle, physical, and metabolic mediators. Cox proportional hazard models and log-linear models were used to derive indirect effect estimates and proportions mediated. RESULTS: A total of 254,695 participants were included. Both anxiety disorder (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.15-2.13) and depression (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.75-2.64) were associated with CVD after adjusting for sociodemographic confounders. Among lifestyle and physical factors, the strongest mediators were current smoking and higher waist-hip ratio which accounted for 11.9% and 13.4% of the excess risk from anxiety disorder, and 17.3% and 14.0% from depression, respectively. The strongest metabolic mediators were systolic blood pressure for anxiety disorder (10.4%) and CRP (10.8%) for depression. Systolic blood pressure was the weakest mediator for depression (4.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle and physical pathways to incident CVD may be common to both anxiety disorder and depression, but shared metabolic pathways seem unlikely. Our findings inform which risk factors to target among people with anxiety disorder or depression in order to reduce their higher risk of developing CVD.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shinya Nakada
University of Glasgow
Carlos Celis‐Morales
Preventive Cardiology
Jill P. Pell
Preventive Cardiology
ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
University of Glasgow
Catholic University of the Maule
Arturo Prat University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nakada et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in Anxiety disorder and depression (n=254,695). Anxiety disorder and depression vs. No anxiety disorder or depression was evaluated on incident CVD (HR 1.62 (anxiety), HR 2.15 (depression), 95% CI 1.15-2.13 (anxiety), 1.75-2.64 (depression)). Anxiety disorder (HR 1.62; 95% CI 1.15-2.13) and depression (HR 2.15; 95% CI 1.75-2.64) were associated with incident CVD, mediated by shared lifestyle but distinct metabolic factors.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20b143f778797513eb87bb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf110