Key result
Anxiety disorder linked to ~62% higher incident CVD risk, largely mediated by smoking and adiposity.
Why the study?
Although anxiety disorder and depression increase cardiovascular disease risk, few studies have systematically examined their underlying mechanisms or contrasted differences between them.
Does anxiety disorder or depression increase the risk of incident cardiovascular disease, and what are the mediating lifestyle, physical, and metabolic pathways?
Cohort (n=254,695)
Yes
Does anxiety disorder or depression increase the risk of incident cardiovascular disease, and what are the mediating lifestyle, physical, and metabolic pathways?
Hazard Ratio: 1.62 (95% CI 1.15–2.13)
Absolute Event Rate: 5.8% vs 3.9%
Smoking and central obesity are common pathways linking anxiety and depression to incident CVD, while elevated systolic blood pressure is a more specific mediator for anxiety, and inflammation (CRP) for depression, which can inform targeted prevention strategies.
AIMS: Although anxiety disorder and depression increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, few studies have examined their underlying mechanisms systematically, particularly contrasting the difference between the two of them. Our study aimed to examine the extent to which lifestyle, physical and metabolic factors mediate the associations of anxiety disorder and depression with incident CVD. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted using UK Biobank. Anxiety disorder, depression, and incident CVD were ascertained through linkage to hospital and death records. A causal mediation analysis was performed for anxiety disorder and depression, separately examining multiple potential lifestyle, physical, and metabolic mediators. Cox proportional hazard models and log-linear models were used to derive indirect effect estimates and proportions mediated. RESULTS: A total of 254,695 participants were included. Both anxiety disorder (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.15-2.13) and depression (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.75-2.64) were associated with CVD after adjusting for sociodemographic confounders. Among lifestyle and physical factors, the strongest mediators were current smoking and higher waist-hip ratio which accounted for 11.9% and 13.4% of the excess risk from anxiety disorder, and 17.3% and 14.0% from depression, respectively. The strongest metabolic mediators were systolic blood pressure for anxiety disorder (10.4%) and CRP (10.8%) for depression. Systolic blood pressure was the weakest mediator for depression (4.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle and physical pathways to incident CVD may be common to both anxiety disorder and depression, but shared metabolic pathways seem unlikely. Our findings inform which risk factors to target among people with anxiety disorder or depression in order to reduce their higher risk of developing CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakada et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Anxiety disorder and depression (n=254,695). Anxiety disorder vs. No anxiety disorder was evaluated on Incident cardiovascular disease (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.15-2.13). Anxiety disorder and depression were associated with increased incident CVD (HR 1.62 and 2.15, respectively), with smoking and central adiposity acting as the strongest shared mediators.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: